|
Commentaries
Tax Reform
Savings,
Retirement and Social Security Reform
Contributing
Members Commentaries
|
Obama's Best Jobs Idea
Congress should continue to allow small businesses
to expense capital equipment purchases.
Wall Street Journal
December 12, 2009
By Ernest S. Christian and Gary A. Robbins

In the hunt for private-sector jobs that don't
depend on government subsidies, President Obama has done one
right thing. He's asked Congress to continue to permit small
businesses to expense capital equipment purchases and large
businesses to deduct 50% in the first year. If these write-offs
are allowed to expire at the end of the year, the after-tax
cost of business equipment would rise and tend to stifle the
nascent economic recovery.
Better yet, Mr. Obama and the Democratic Congress should make
the write-offs permanent, 100%, and across the board for all
companies. Capital investment is a sure-fire way of creating
jobs and income, and more of it is badly needed.
As we showed in a study for the Institute for Policy Innovation,
each $1 of tax cut from first-year expensing typically eventually
produces about $9 of additional GDP growth. That's because
to receive the tax cut a business must invest $3 to $6 in
new equipment. The added investment leads to a $2 to $4 increase
in labor compensation as well. The resulting increase in GDP
compounds over time.
Expensing, in one form or another, has worked every time it
has been tried-four times in the 1960s and 1970s, again in
1981-1982, again in 2002-2004 and, most recently, in 2008-2009.
And it is not an emergency stimulant; it is the correct way
to treat capital investment and a key component of all mainstream
tax-reform proposals.
Because of the time value of money, a business that can't
expense equipment right away never is able to deduct the full
replacement cost of its purchases. This makes capital equipment
more expensive and less affordable. Expensing in effect reduces
the cost back to where it should be. Businesses won't buy
equipment that they don't need, but, at a lower price, they
will buy a larger volume more quickly.
Expensing is especially important now. Since 2007, the decline
in nonresidential capital goods investment has been 18 times
greater than the decline in consumption (a 19.9% decline for
investment compared to a 1.1% decline in consumption).
First-year expensing is not without cost from a budget-accounting
standpoint in the short run. (In the long run it evens out-companies
deduct more of its equipment costs early on and pay less tax,
but later deduct less and pay more tax.) But surely, with
a $3.6 trillion budget and a $1.4 trillion deficit, there's
room for a tax cut that has no peer as a proven job-creating
machine in the private sector.
Mr. Christian, an attorney, was a deputy assistant secretary
of the Treasury under President Ford. Mr. Robbins, an economist,
served at the Treasury Department under President Reagan.
|